Full-time university students need to spend a lot of time on studying, but it is essential to get involved other activities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The idea that, besides paying all attention to academic subjects only, full-time university students should also take part in extracurricular remains a source of controversy. In my opinion, I believe that out-of-class activities would bring a host of benefits for students.
One of the main advantages, when students involve extra activities, is the social skills that they learn from such experiences. Firstly, it is extracurricular that enable learners to gain new knowledge and cognitive development. When working together with other individuals, students learn to communicate fluently and achieve more self-confidence, autonomy. Moreover, they have a chance to appreciate other's similarities and differences, therefore not only could they learn from other's mistakes but also strength. Secondly, taking part in activities outside the classroom help students to learn to negotiate, manage conflicts, cooperate with fellow students. Besides, any types of such activities enable students to perceive the significance of critical thinking skills.
Another notable advantage of participating in other activities is that students could upgrade social skills specific to career paths. Extracurricular activities enable students to associate academic knowledge with practical experiences. Nowadays, social skills have become more and more important, even as necessary as any academic qualifications. Therefore, being excel in a range of social skills learned from out-of-class activities allow students to attain jobs easier right after graduation. Furthermore, the campus is an appropriate place for students to share and discuss prevalent issues, and feel socially connected with others.
To sum up, by associating between academic lessons and extracurricular activities, students could gain huge opportunities for their self- development and future career paths.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.09505703422 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25815802115 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608365019011 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.7369837965 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.5 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148627131696 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521519518822 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344583582938 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867651032831 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386347295922 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.1 12.4159519038 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.