In the future, all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers.
Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages.
Nowadays, our world is witnessing an explosion in the techonological revolution with the appearance of various state-of-the-art machines so it is obvious that driverless vehicles will appear in the near future. While this scenario can bring some pontential advantages, I believe that it can create a chaotic landscape.
On the one hand, driverless cars or buses can provide passengers with safer and more exiting journeys. That is because there is no need for them to concentrate on driving; instead of that, they can comfortably spend time on other interesting activities. For example, it is possible that they can enjoy the picturesque scenery outside the window of the car, listen to favorite songs or even indulge in conversations with our partners without worrying about causing accidents. Moreover, to the extent of convenience, it is much beneficial for people to possess a driveless car thanks to the mapping system installed in its device. Firstly, in terms of travelling, just by typing the destination's name that you want to go in the system, you can freely go there whenever you are able to make time. Secondly, these systems are also well-programmed to find the most direct rout or even to avoid the on-going traffic jam, which can save a large amount of time and effort.
On the other hand, it is also so dangerous for people to utilize in the aspect of technique. First of all, because of the fact that all of these devices are programmed so there is no doubt about the absolute appearance of technical errors. For example, the mapping system can possibly determine the wrong destinations, which can waste a lot of time and make the passengers get lost. The second is that the systems in the vehicles can be hacked. As a result, hackers can monitor the destination that has been configured in advance to take the passengers to somewhere else for the bad purpose. Besides, that all private and public vehicles will be completely substituted by driverless ones also lead to the huge proportion of unemployment. The reason is that nowdays there are hundreds of people working as taxi, bus or truck drivers. Consequently, sooner or later, these people will lose their jobs and possibly have to reskill themselves to make ends meet. Not only the workforce but also the government will have to shoulder the financial burden to support these drivers with unemployment benefits and other relevant charges. Given the mentioned drawbacks, the scenario of driverless vehicles will be extremely chaotic.
In summary, despite some benefits in terms of personal experience and convenience, I believe that replacing conventional cars with driverless ones will cause a variety of issues related to society, security, cost and unemployment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 894, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...e most direct rout or even to avoid the on-going traffic jam, which can save a large amo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
... the aspect of technique. First of all, because of the fact that all of these devices are programmed so ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...errors. For example, the mapping system can possibly determine the wrong destinations, which...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in summary, no doubt, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 449.0 315.596192385 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12026726058 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92979140219 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541202672606 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4900935159 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6315789474 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15789473684 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264794558827 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839749173716 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783496267445 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145180433754 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871249525519 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.