In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages

Driverless automobiles are of global interest nowadays and a perception has been made that in coming times, the only people travelling through them will be passengers, as they can be driven by their own. The advantages and disadvantages of these types of vehicles will be discussed in the passage along with a conclusion.

The first benefit of driverless automobiles is that machines are proved to be more attentive and safe than humans when it comes to efficiency in any kind of work. Thus, computers can be seen as more reliable than humans for driving. Furthermore, the accident cases due to drink and drive and other reasons such abad mood or subconsciousness reduces significantly as vehicles will be controlled by computers.

Also, most of the parents are working these days and due to their busy schedule, they are unable to pick and drop their children from school. Technology driven automobiles helps to solve these problems as children can rely on them without any need of their parents. For the same reason, people who suffer from physical disabilities can depend on them as they would not need any human assistance.

With pros, driverless vehicles also have some cons. Sometimes the autopilot motors can have some functioning problems such as low levels of battery or other technological issues. These types of problems increases the risk of accidents. Moreover, the dependency of people on machines is increasing day by day which makes them lazy.

To conclude, from the above arguments, it can be said that advantages of driverless vehicles are more than disadvantages. The demerits can reduce further if computers are taken care of regularly and checked before driving.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... disabilities can depend on them as they would not need any human assistance. ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, kind of, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16727272727 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87985307247 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9922854917 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259609869044 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927860819103 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936277020532 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158134414716 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116076250141 0.056905535591 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.