In this advanced generation, technology has taken a vital role in every human life. Almost every citizen relies on technology. Some people argue that, after 50 years, it will be hard to see drivers because there might be driverless cars. Although this phenomenon puts people in safety from an accident, I believe that there could be a scarcity of employment which easily outweigh the adversities.
First and foremost, the advantages include being safe from road accidents. Many drivers break traffic rules, and if we go for a long road trip, then almost every driver consumes alcohol. Due to these reasons, there are more road accidents, according to the Road Survey Organization. But, automatic vehicles will take passengers safely. This type of problem would be not seen in driverless vehicles. Moreover, many drivers drive haphazardly, and since ageing people find it difficult to travel, and we are also not able to read anything while sitting in the bus, these circumstances cannot exist in driverless vehicles.
On the other hand, the downsides are scarcity of employment. In some countries, many people depend on driving as an occupation; their way of life depends on it. If this job will not available to them then there will be a serious problem with living. Similarly, it would be very expensive to own driverless vehicles, and also for maintenance. For example, it is undeniable that machinery items are costly, and the government has to invest huge amounts of money in their maintenance.
In conclusion, since the ratio of road accidents could decline and people can easily read while travelling, the cons include the scarcity of jobs and the expense of maintenance. I believe that advantages easily outnumber disadvantages
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ation; their way of life depends on it. If this job will not available to them the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, similarly, so, then, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82154766588 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58865248227 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6809831393 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7058823529 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247551310888 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734391609988 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688348559583 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136838830764 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500864612564 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.