In the future, all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people traveling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
In the current era, with the development of technology, means of transportation have been replaced by automatic vehicles. Many people think that all vehicles will be automated and no longer require drivers, while I believe that the advantages of driverless transport outweigh its drawbacks.
On the one hand, various reasons explain why automation can bring difficulties for drivers. First and foremost, driverless cars are designed with the available settings, which are challenging to suit some situations. These include the technical difficulties in ensuring that the vehicle works reliably in the infinite range of traffic, weather, and road situations it might encounter. As a result, we can not prevent unpredictable situations that may be dangerous to our survival. Furthermore, fixing an automated vehicle is time-consuming, and costs an arm and a leg, even considering outlook the expenditure on buying new cars, so it poses an enormous burden on our finances.
It seems to me that using automated transportation has various advantages, such as safety and the disabled. The first reason is that driverless automation prevents people from risks; for instance, more than 90% of road collisions involve human errors as a contributory factor, such as drinking beer and losing control. Therefore, automation may help to reduce the incidence of this. In addition, people can have more free time to relax and do other tasks, while automated systems take responsibility for driving and ensuring your safety. Finally, it is helpful for mobility for the elderly and disabled, who may not be physically or legally able to operate a human-driven vehicle.
In conclusion, the drawbacks of this technology are more than its fines. I prefer vehicles with a driver due to the sense of safety that they give me.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'suiting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: suiting
...ailable settings, which are challenging to suit some situations. These include the tech...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... dangerous to our survival. Furthermore, fixing an automated vehicle is time-cons...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32517482517 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06784460124 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632867132867 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0419305781 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.785714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187269007341 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562348118236 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863175678169 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116071550086 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828331041503 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.