In the future, nobody will buy newspaper or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
From the first day of inventing writing and languages, the homo sapiens seems to have reached a higher realm of perception and creation. In my opinion, no matter how advanced technology is, humankind is not able to replace this kind of intangible cultural heritage with anything, including updating news through electronic devices.
On the one hand, traditional prints have existed for centuries and become a huge part of the human lifestyle. The primary cause for this importance besides the fact is that it has played a role as an information archiving activity, materialize knowledge, events being written into tangible objects. From some people's points of view, this is a way to connect psychological aspects to human basic emotional
feelings. Taking ebook as an instance, which only exists on digital electronic devices, physical papers are able to bring human spectacular experiences such as something that can be felt by hands, noses, and ears, or can be cherished as a kind of art. Furthermore, a true book might be healthier and more concentrated to brood over every word in it as it solely includes essentials. It is definitely the opposite of smart electronic appliances that are usually full of all distractions.
On the other side, using state-of-the-art equipment is not too bad to update situations of the world. Firstly, ebooks are incredibly advantageous, convenient, and accessible which would be the best choice for readers shortly. For example, online threads will be sent to your email if you subscribe to the presses, all kinds of books also can be ordered online with a click. Not to mention, thousands of materials provided by numerous sites and platforms are always available for you on Google. Secondly, because of not consuming papers as well as cutting down trees, the cost of manufacturing and printing has decreased dramatically, which encourages more residents to read online. As a consequence, this is a way to improve the situation of the environment as there is no industrial waste being made in order to produce papers.
In conclusion, it is believed that traditional printing products have played a familiar and vital in our life since forever, whilst it would be best when individuals learn to adopt the new way of reading as well as develop this potential and contemporary industry by protecting the author rights and research wisely.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1991.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14470284238 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98317699631 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622739018088 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.5006859862 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.733333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112906435002 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325124699535 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439549781423 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0517924080588 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444226917724 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.