The bar chart below shows the percentage of Austalian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. Summarise the information by selcting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This given chart illustrates the ratio of Australian people of both genders in various age gaps who exercise regularly 11 years ago.
Generally, in the younger days, men tended to work out more than women, whereas the ladies enjoyed practicing in quiet old age. However, the subjects of this survey are divided into 2 groups: the younger one (aging between 15 and 44) and the older one ( aging from 45 and so on).
Firstly, in the most frivolous 9 years of a human being's life (between15 and 24), men exercised quite hard with the rate of 52.8%, whereas simultaneously, females only reached the percentage of 47.7, 5.1% lower. In the next age gap, from 25 to 34, there was a dramatic decrease in male statistics with the difference of 10.6% and kept on falling to 39.5% in the 35-to-44 age gap. Despite this, the female percentage climbed steadily and negligibly from 47.7% to 48.9%, then to 52.5% at the same time.
Furthermore, in the older age gap, people witnessed a growth of men percentage after the decline in the younger times with the statistic of 43.1% to 45.1% and continued steadily increasing to 46,7%. The female ratio, which was completely contrasted to men's one, saw a slight drop of 0,3%, then suddenly fell to 47.1%, 5.9% lower than before.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ging between 15 and 44 and the older one aging from 45 and so on. Firstly, in ...
^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...n the most frivolous 9 years of a human beings life between15 and 24, men exercised qu...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77625570776 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52268951441 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643835616438 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.9828581638 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.75 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124012024229 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551030904507 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0250304497424 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789651832631 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135612491993 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.