In future nobody will buy the printed books or newspapers beacause they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent to you agree or disagree with this statement?
Technological advancements are increasing day by day and new inventions have made our life more comfortable and easy. One of these inventions is digital newspapers or books. There is increasing debate over this topic that, whether this will lead to the eradication of printed books or newspapers or not. This essay focuses on the diverse attitude towards information sharing and a reasoned conclusion with my personal opinion.
Modern advancements have lead to digital newspapers or books. Many such apps have been launched recently which provide reading books and news sitting at home and without paying for the same. This has few advantages as we can read our favorite books whenever we want without spending much money on them. But, on the other hand, these systems have various disadvantages. Such as, we need to have internet or wifi to read online newspapers and books, but everybody cannot afford wifi just for sake of reading books. Also, elder people are the ones who are keen on reading newspapers rather than the younger ones. As older people are not technology friendly. Hence, they find it difficult to operate the app or particular website just for reading a newspaper. My grandfather is very keen on reading books of brave warriors and also newspapers but he finds it very tedious to run the app just to read newspapers that to on the mobile. Hence he decided to start reading printed newspapers again.
Even though books or another reading material is avaliable online it will not eradicate the traditional printed books or newspapers. It can be another option but the best. I disagree with, what writer has conveyed in the topic that payment is not required for reading online The reality I have faced is totally opposite to given scenario. Every time when I wanted to read a particular favorite book of mine the app or website asked me to do payment first and then proceed towards reading. No free access was provided. Even today students prefer studying from books rather than referring to the soft copy of the books. Also, if we sit in front of screen more than what is required, eyesight problems may arise resulting in bad headaches, etc.
Therefore reading books or other items online can be a good substitute for printed items but not something that will take place of printed newspapers, or magazines, or books. Also, payment is required in both cases but much less amount for printed items than the apps, or websites which provide the same thing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 410, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...aring and a reasoned conclusion with my personal opinion. Modern advancements have lead to dig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 611, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ewspapers rather than the younger ones. As older people are not technology friendl...
^^
Line 2, column 931, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... read newspapers that to on the mobile. Hence he decided to start reading printed new...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, so, then, therefore, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 10.4138276553 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 419.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90930787589 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56531829125 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536992840095 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9364941871 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4347826087 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2173913043 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52173913043 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270654777824 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704228130601 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582864099244 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156784964725 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252197534444 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.