Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What are ther other measures do you think might be effective?
Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples of your own knowledge and experience.
Write atleast 250 words.
The problems, which are increasing day by day in most of the metropolitan cities, are traffic congestion and pollution. Increasing the rates of petrol might be one of the solutions, but not the best way to deal with the problem. Therefore, I strongly oppose the idea as there other aspects too. These should be considered as well, if we want to abate the effects, which we face, due to traffic and pollution. In this essay, we'll discuss other important measures to alleviate the problems.
Modern advancements have positive effects on various aspects including public transport. Minimizing the use of private vehicles by increasing the use of public transport, can be another important aspect that should be taken into consideration. This will make sure that fewer cars or other private vehicles will be on the roads reducing the traffic jams and hence resulting into lesser emissions of carbon-di-oxide into the environment. For instance, if four people make an uber pool then the fuel required is lesser in amount as compared to the separate four private vehicles. In this way, we can help decrease the traffic congestion issue, thereby reducing the pollution.
Furthermore, imposing strict traffic rules can be another way out. Government should taken initiative and apply strict regulations and can impose an extortionate fine on those who do not follow them religiously. This will ensure that people are aware of the rules and regulations and then only they are getting their vehicles on road. For instance, in Delhi, there are signals on each main road, and rules are imposed. Due to this, the traffic was under control and there were only required number on private vehicles on road. Hence only increasing the price of fuel won't lead to decrease in the problem. Because people may find illegal ways to get petrol and other required fuels.
Hereby, I conclude, increasing-prices of petrol is one of the important aspects, which will help in abating these problems but not the best and only way to do so. Other important measures should also be taken into considerations if we want to decrease the impacts of such problems on our lives and environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The problems, which are increasing day b...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt measures to alleviate the problems. Modern advancements have positive effect...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...issue, thereby reducing the pollution. Furthermore, imposing strict traffic rul...
^^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have taken' or 'take'?
Suggestion: have taken; take
...n be another way out. Government should taken initiative and apply strict regulations...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...red number on private vehicles on road. Hence only increasing the price of fuel wont ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o get petrol and other required fuels. Hereby, I conclude, increasing-prices of...
^^^
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...should also be taken into considerations if we want to decrease the impacts of su...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03631284916 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7830608569 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491620111732 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1213961194 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8947368421 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8421052632 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188873757453 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621810411727 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478318476648 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128106005524 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359905927511 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.