There are millions of reading materials digitalized online nowadays. It is forseeable the digital books and newspapers will be in a predominent position in the future. However, I do not fully agree that nobody will read printed materials which will be completely replaced with the digital ones for free. I will elaborate on my views as follows.
For one thing, the trend of digitalizing will prosper and dominate the future reading world. As the digital materials are easier to be stored online and more accessible to people. Even if one who is handicaped with the eyes, the computer can read for him/her. Especcially by the developments of hand-held devices like iPads, more and more readers will be in fond of this new way of reading.
Moreover, people can view rare books not only from Libraries but also from Museums. Nowadays it is impossible for us to read the books exhibited in the museums page by page since we are not allowed to touch them, let alone take notes. The digital versions, however, can be read by all of us and we can make notes if we read them on hand-held devices. This advantage will attract more people to read compared with the untouchable books.
The last but not least, the printed materials will not step down the history stage. The printed books will stay since there are still some people would like to read in papers instead of in front of screens. Also, the paper ones are good for our eyes.
In all, the digital materials will be the major source for us to read in the future as my concern, but it does not mean there will be no printed materials.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67021276596 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4420371816 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514184397163 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2466516171 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3125 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279645980391 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103919988249 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688039560358 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17905818411 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640148733026 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.