In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything thay want online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Since several developments in technologies have been changing individual habits, many people claim that physical books and newspapers would no longer be read in the future where online references dominate these old fashion ones. In my opinion, while I believe these amenities could bring benefits for readers, I believe that people should conserve books and newspapers due to the less credibility and privacy of online references.
Online reading resources could indeed lead to many drawbacks related to untrustworthy information, which could cause adverse effects on society and the economy. Due to millions of people using the internet, the information spread around the world in seconds without any administrations. Therefore, it could put risks on society if some news deliberately to cause crises among people. For instance, illegal organizations can take advantage of sending rumors about an imminent economic depression or wars. As a result, many people would probably hoard foods and essential supplies, which causes the prices of specific products to rocket as these criminal interests.
Furthermore, cyber-attacks are another drawback of this trend, since malware could access personal computers to steal information by online reading platforms. Therefore, readers are vulnerable to blackmails, which makes them feel insecure and affects their well-being. In contrast, books and printed newspapers offer no chance for hackers to manipulate personal privacy. Because information and contents have to go through rigorous administrations and authorized processes, it is almost reliable sources for people to reference. Moreover, these kinds of referenced resources could be well preserved in a long time and passed to many people as valuable gifts without any risks.
In conclusion, physical books and references would continue to flourish in the future because of its advantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73665480427 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98040526895 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640569395018 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7725989412 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125255866286 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431061854463 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377698571089 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838359289275 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327847399527 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.