In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is argued that in up-coming years, because of improvement in technological devices, there will be no individuals who may be fond of purchasing books and newspapers. This is due to a cause that they would read various topics on the internet without wasting any money. I totally disagree with this opinion based on some reasons which will be clarified later.
To commence with, several reasons have propelled some individuals not to be concurred with disappearing paper base of newspapers and books in the future. The first one has been the unfair distribution of development. Some areas have still had several basic issues, although the world has witnessed a high pace of improving electronic devices. Take, Yemen, as an example, where residents have had deep difficulties which have led them not to be able to afford to buy electronic devices. When people could not be able to buy gadgets, therefore, they could not have ability to read articles and news on the internet. They will keep buying newspapers in order to be informed about diverse situations around the world even in their future, consequently.
In addition, in spite of not being able to afford electronic devices, there would be several individuals who may have a keen interest in reading paper resources. These people may be extremely prosperous, but cannot continue reading with their tablets. This could result in not only having trouble to read because of their eyes, but also not to have a good relation with gadgets. As gadgets may have adverse effects on eyes, some people have more interest in reading with real books in order to decline those circumstances. Moreover, even though technology has played a significant role in people’s lives, some may not have a satisfying relationship with it. In their spare time, as a result, they prefer to read paper base rather than e-books.
In conclusion, based on writer’s opinion, there are some specific issues such as earning less amount of money in some societies as well as being fond of reading books rather than with gadgets. According to those reasons, in near future there will be fewer possibilities that books and newspapers would be completely vanished.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05248618785 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73945277526 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522099447514 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.640751908 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.588235294 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94117647059 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269679298994 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972859387325 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569414265024 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190121472542 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479276365546 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.