In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

It is undeniable that the tendency of reading newspaper or books has increased significantly in our society. While I accept that this is true in the modern life, I believe that the benefits of reading newspaper or book traditionally are considerable.
There are several convincing reasons why reading online has been more and more popular in this century. Firstly, the convenience of reading in the Internet has attracted more people to use this method. Thanks to modern technology devices and the development of Internet speed, human can have access to the Internet easily wherever they go, and update important news in over the world. Even reader can update continually the latest news or their concerning news rather than waiting for printing newspapers in the next day. Furthermore, users only have to Internet fees to reading newspaper. This is because some websites allow users reading pieces of news without paying, which is much cheaper than buying newspaper or books.
On the other hand, we can not deny the benefits of the newspapers. Firstly, people buy printed newspapers and magazines because of their reliability or trust. This means that in order to be published, newspapers or magazines have already censored carefully by national or local authorities, which helps readers avoid reading the fake news. Another important reason is that reading paper books or paper makes reader more comfortable rather than looking at the screen for hours. Besides, some people have a habit of collecting the interesting image related to series of important events in the world, so buying printed newspaper is a way great.
In conclusion, there are compelling arguments both for and against publishing paper books, magazines and newspaper.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 714, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h cheaper than buying newspaper or books On the other hand we can not deny the be...
^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'makes'' or 'make's'?
Suggestion: makes'; make's
...on is that reading paper books or paper makes reader more comfortable rather than loo...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... newspaper is a way great In conclusion there are compelling arguments both for ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, so, while, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1690647482 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67383322028 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535971223022 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 278.0 20.2975951904 1370% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1437.0 106.682146367 1347% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 278.0 20.7667163134 1339% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 91.0 7.06120827912 1289% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213306610413 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.213306610413 0.084324248473 253% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126654796711 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415415604781 0.056905535591 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 141.9 13.0946893788 1084% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -210.69 50.2224549098 -420% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 111.7 11.3001002004 988% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.19 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.17 8.58950901804 246% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 9.78957915832 582% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 113.2 10.1190380762 1119% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 57.0 10.7795591182 529% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.