These days, consumption of natural resources like oil and gas are mounting globally. This is worried issue because these kinds of resources are not replaceable. Hence, this matter motivates people to exploit and seek origins in remote territories. I disagree with this idea on account of this act would have several drawbacks and harmful consequences.
To bring with, it is true that numerous countries suffer from lack of oil and gas origins which are valuable. But one of the reason why I do not accept this hypothesis is about some inaccessible regions that are located in poles and coolest areas. In fact, it would be costly for government and there should be diverse professional equipment for exploitation. Furthermore, if there would be an approach to reach resources easily, that is a serious threat for habitat of animals and residential people who live there.
In addition, another conspicuous reason to refuse this idea is about global warming and health issue that rooted in frequent consuming gas and oil. Although, these are worthwhile substances for transport, factories and other usages, the destructive effects on plants and earth (acid rain, greenhouse gases) should not underestimate.
On the other hand, technology brings new methods to use such as solar and electricity energies, instead of applying oil and gas. For illustration, electric auto is an effective breakthrough for reducing consumption of fossil fuels. Furthermore, there should be more efforts from scientists to discover more alternative ways to preserve living standard because exhausted non-renewable energies will accompanied with problems.
In conclusion, fossil fuels are useful; however, they have more negative effects on planet rather than advantages. Meanwhile, disadvantages are obvious to universe and people should invest in other reproducible resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 399, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'accompany'
Suggestion: accompany
...e exhausted non-renewable energies will accompanied with problems. In conclusion, fossi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 415, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...renewable energies will accompanied with problems. In conclusion, fossil fuels...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55281690141 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99353556974 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633802816901 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6673927314 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.133333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217789240879 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661183670603 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331530100732 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107579030003 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363764227673 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.