The government’s investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. To what extend do u agree with this statement.
It is an undesirable fact that art plays an indispensable role in human civilization from stone’s age so higher authorities should spend on arts. However, if they have an immense amount of funds, I have mixed views about this notion which I will elaborate in impending paragraphs.
To embark on, there is no dubiety in the fact that in this contemporary world, a requirement of art is proliferating at an exorbitant rate to save the culture and tradition of a country. Secondly, the regime should give money to art places as they attract tourism. Tourism is the backbone of every country because it increases economic values. In addition, it not only keep the history but also teach the history as well as the culture and tradition to the new generation. To epitome, a survey conducted by WHO in 2016 described that 90% of tourists are greatly affected by the art galleries in India.
On the flip side, there is no exaggeration in writing that if a nation has a lack of public services, then the Government must use the funds on public services. When money will be utilized in an efficient way, the dwellers will be more happy and conformable when they will have proper transport, educational and health facilities. Also, in this era population is increasing enormously and need of public services are also shown huge numbers so Government should give more favour to the public. To cite an example, In Mumbai, the regime spent a vast amount of fund on arts rather public infrastructure.
Hammering on the last nail, it can be envisioned from aforementioned points that although the use of funds on art is essential. (Give a reason why use of art is essential) However, I cogitate that if higher authorities have limited funds, then it ought to spend on the public services.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...c services. When money will be utilized in an efficient way, the dwellers will be more happy and co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82352941176 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89321829789 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.977432871 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.538461538 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134108246513 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455630261834 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484146568441 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0736544551822 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539967859397 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.