The government should ban smoking in all public places, even though this would restrict some other people's freedoms.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer.
Smoking and drinking are injurious to health, this is possibly read or heard by everyone in most of the advertisements or movies openings as this is under the act of government to let people know about this. This is important because many of the health problems are related to this habit only, may it be on personal level or community level. I am in strong support that smoking should be banned in all the public places even if some people consider it as an act of blocking their freedom.
Smoking can be responsible for many of the health hazards such as Lung cancer, mouth cancer and even asthma to a smoker. Doing this in public places will not only affect that person but the people surrounding them. There was an article few months back, where it was clearly mentioned that passive smokers get more health risks than that of active smokers. Even a person’s true story concerning this was also mentioned there, stating that he was a part of the group of people who were chain smokers and then how he got diversely affected because of smoking passively only. Smoking is not at all good to be done but still it’s somewhat fine if this will be done in private and not in public.
Additionally, environmental depletion can also be controlled to some extent by taking this step. People smoke and all of that mixes up in the air and we all inhale it which has detrimental effects in one or the other way on health of every individual. Old age people suffer the most as they get these respiratory problems as asthma. Talking about Delhi the capital of India which creates a benchmark for every other place in for smoke, is so much smoky that lung problems are seen even in young children by a report published quite a years back. So basically, restricting freedom of people is still better than sacrificing life.
To sum up, Government should take strict actions for banning smoking in public places irrespective of someone thinking it as a restriction to their way of living. Appropriate rules and fines should be imposed, So that people will follow them if not considering it as a global perspective but with the fear of being caught.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 533, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a year' or simply 'years'?
Suggestion: a year; years
...ng children by a report published quite a years back. So basically, restricting freedom...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, then, such as, talking about, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70448548813 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56952259705 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554089709763 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.9597795971 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.866666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2666666667 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269217355959 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937280496187 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576815458128 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171940224066 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269751329485 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.