Government should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations To what extent do you agree or disagree

Scientific research is expanding worldwide and more people are participating in this area, and. In today’s society, undertaking these researches is one of the most contentious issue whether it has to be under the official authorities or private groups. However, I believe governments and official authorities should have the predominant responsibility and main superintendence on it.
Firstly, governments tend to be dramatically more efficient in making a real difference in the lives of real people. Because they are accountable to the public whom are paying taxes for such exercises. For example, solar energy and space researches that granted an immense improvement for publics overall life. Therefore, government’s achievements in scientific researches will be available for all even for future generation to keep progressing towards success and humanity development.
Moreover, scientific researches that been conducted by authorities are knowledge oriented, so its results will be available for public, where any one can access it either for information or for advanced researches during their university studies. Accordingly, individuals obtain a chance to participate with the science progress and scientific research under free of cost. For example, electricity solar resources where the latest achievements in this fields are available to the public a cross the world. Therefore, an immense progress and incredible results have been achieved.
On the other hand, Private industry won’t make the investments for pure science, and it is too insistent on immediate returns on investments, so that private investors will not devote money to research that lacks an obvious commercial application. This is usually said in such a way as to suggest that private investors are vulgar materialists, too faithless to be patient for the long-term rewards for research or too ignoble to approve of knowledge for its own sake. For example, drugs’ companies that work in finding new cures for diseases and ailments, and then offering it to the public with huge prices that cannot be afforded by the majority of people.
In conclusion, I believe government authorities are the right associates for implementing scientific researches. While Official authorities will work for the benefits of public taking into consideration the whole community’s prosperity and sustainability, private groups invest in such research with the need commercial results is paramount. In future, I think more combination and coordination between the efforts of authorities and private sector in science industry to ensure the maximum use of skillful and dexterous staff.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (9 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wards success and humanity development. Moreover, scientific researches that bee...
^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...lts will be available for public, where any one can access it either for information or...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ources where the latest achievements in this fields are available to the public a cr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
...e need commercial results is paramount. In future, I think more combination and coordinat...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, on the whole, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2276.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70426065163 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27400995897 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4639702004 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.882352941 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4705882353 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11764705882 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244843284784 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844609807737 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443305186078 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149350569287 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230018937032 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.