In the last decades, many fields of our society have had a rapid development which has brought a several changes with it. In today’s society it is necessary to get the right people into the right seats. However, older workers may set in their ways and potentially against changes, I would still consider the importance of their valuable experience in all workplaces.
Broadly spoken, elder workers gained knowledge during all their work life, and this is a benefit that has to be kept in every environment. Despite having a deep and modern knowledge acquired during the studies can be really helpful, hands on experience is really valuable for every kind of job. For example, An Engineer who used to work in a construction industry for almost 20 years, he will be more competent and prolific in dealing with issues and challenges that he might facing during his career. For this reason, although workers over 50 are not very responsive to change, they are still really useful.
Moreover, older people are more reliable and respectful than younger workers. That can be seen with the trend of many department store in the UK to take on older people. This act of behaviors are really important in the prosperity in any kind of working environment.
Furthermore, despite the progress of business has to be stimulated, social reasons like employment of people from different age groups is still really crucial for the security of our societies. A slower but sustainable development has to be granted in order to maintain the right balance among the people of a whole community.
On the other hands, there are a number of job roles that enforce employers to employ younger workers. Since physiologists confirmed that the memory declines with age for people, it will be fruitless to appoint an older worker in specific industries. For example, technological industry that requires a person who is capable of dealing with a numerous amount of numbers, calculation, systems and information which are more available with younger employees than older workers.
In conclusion, I believe despite employing older people might be a challenge in some particular jobs due to some reasons such as inflexibility to change, they can still be very useful and producers in many kinds of job environment for their substantial and valuable experience. In future I think corporates will get better at equalizes opportunities between younger and older workers to achieve better outcomes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...with it. In today's society it is absolutely necessary to get the right people into the right ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 196, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...s with age for people, there will be no use to appoint an older worker in specific ...
^^^
Line 13, column 202, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun kind seems to be countable; consider using: 'many kinds'.
Suggestion: many kinds
...n still be very useful and producers in many kind of job environment for their substantia...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of job environment for their substantial and valuable experience . In future I th...
^^
Line 13, column 277, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...eir substantial and valuable experience . In future I think corporates will get b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, still, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 408.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15441176471 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82561473179 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536764705882 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0451627141 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.705882353 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47058823529 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198721221933 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651876446046 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561056045442 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0938212016152 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482557462598 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.