The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the rate of violent crime in society. Do you agree or diagree?
With the development of technology, people can access social media without control. Although some people believe that it is necessary to control the films broadcasted on television, I still believe that limiting the violence shown in film and on television do not the factor contributing to the rise of the crime rate.
On the one hand, there are various reasons explained why authorities should strictly manage violence programs. Firstly, because of the development of technology, people have more opportunities to access the Internet and social media that most crime targets. For example, if several toxic films and illegal activities are on television, they will misunderstand that what programs broadcast on television is always correct. Therefore, those programs may incite teenagers to commit criminal offenses. Furthermore, there is a positive correlation between watching violent films and physical aggression against another person.
On the other hand, I believe that people should have the freedom to use media. The first reason is that media violence has a greater impact on our thinking and emotions than our behaviors. For instance, although millions of people watch violent films every day, no one or a few become criminals because they are aware of activities are illegal and harmful to society. As a result, they should avoid it. In addition, people suffer from various factors to commit to illegal activities such as poverty and despair, not only violent programs. They cannot meet their needs and earn a living, so many have committed crimes.
In conclusion, although crime thrillers influence crimes in society, I oppose the opinion because it will limit media and individuals' freedom to express their opinions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39852398524 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76616940839 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579335793358 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6242661826 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182370809145 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578986187486 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553420480522 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117297703288 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595247089975 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.