Government should invest in teaching science subjects rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some opinions assume that it is better if governments allocate more resources on teaching science subjects rather than other ones so as to develop countries. Although I partly agree that science courses are instrumental in developing and progressing countries, I believe that we should not ignore the significance of the remaining ones.
On the one hand, it is undoubted that science subjects are necessary for many reasons. In terms of social aspects, governments should invest in improving the staff of scientists who lead to solve urgent problems in society. For example, every nation today has to take the fight against global warming and climate change into consideration, and therefore, they need more and more scientists to research effective and efficient interventions to mitigate these issues. From a medical perspective, following the strong emergence of both physical and mental problems due to a fast-paced lifestyle today, doctors and scientists play an integral part in searching for a cure. Many people who are prone to brain disruptions caused by a heavy workload need support from doctors who are equipped with science and medical knowledge.
On the other hand, albeit the dispensible role of science subjects, we should not underestimate other subjects. Firstly, contemporary generations have compulsory obligations to preserve artistic and literary heritages of their ancestors so that teachers can deliver vivid lectures to youngsters. And therefore, non-science courses such as history, art, politics remain important to students. Secondly, countries cannot develop if they have a lack of people who have a good understanding of business and managing capacity. Many corporations need students who have a good grasp of business-related subjects such as human resources management or financial management in order to enhance companies’ public images and grow their businesses as well.
To sum up, while science subjects obviously should be invested more to ensure living standards, I believe that governments should raise public’s attention about the importance of other subjects to gain sustainable developments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-15 | cocoza@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-15 | cocoza@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-15 | cocoza@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Nav IELTS | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Nav IELTS | 61 | view |
- The diagram below shows the changes which took place in a coastal area called pentland from 1950 and 2007 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the diagrams below
- The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future 67
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- The charts show the sales of new cars in Australia in 1984 1993 and 2013 73
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...science subjects rather than other ones so as to develop countries. Although I partly ag...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 620, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...business-related subjects such as human resources management or financial management in o...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6346749226 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08840250329 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613003095975 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2124966089 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297418563116 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097764301133 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087417302083 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192918944953 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880740581242 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.