Many people disagree with a school policy which forces children to learn new languages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
While a tendency of studying additionally one or two new tongues is more ubiquitous in the globalized context, some opinions believe that children should be forced to learn new languages at schools. Although I partly agree that schools are instrumental in teaching languages, I also believe that it is better if we search for other incentives to improve children’s capacity.
On the one hand, schools obviously have integral contributions to promote children’s language skills. Firstly, imposing appropriate disciplines at schools helps students to get accustomed to new languages’ principles more easily and professionally. It is clear that children have a better concentration on subjects that being required by their own teachers at schools than when they have lessons through distancing educational methods at home. Secondly, many reports indicated that people should study new languages in formative years to gain the best outcomes. And therefore, it is undoubted that schools are suitable environments to enables children to keep up with new knowledge academically during this early period.
On the other hand, although compulsory programs at schools are accepted widely, it is better if we provide our children with other interesting activities to promote their language skills. Firstly, apart from formal examinations at schools, teachers should take many language-related extra-curricular activities into consideration to help their students to get a sense of comfort and they then easily have a good grasp of academic subjects. Secondly, the parental involvement significantly contributes to the development of their offsprings. Parents should frequently discuss with their children about languages’ advantages and how languages are important as they enter the adults’ lives.
In conclusion, while children should be compulsorily taught new languages at schools, both teachers and parents should be encouraged to provide children with more interesting approaches.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 689, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ortant as they enter the adults’ lives. In conclusion, while children should be ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, apart from, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 5.60731707317 446% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 965.302439024 176% => OK
No of words: 291.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83505154639 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2423440715 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 106.607317073 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570446735395 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 283.868780488 179% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1514300535 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.5 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230002567964 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943664916459 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428714396719 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151724564956 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351243516067 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 11.4140731707 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 40.7170731707 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.