Government should spend money on railways rather than roads? To what extent do u agree or disagree with the statement.
It is needless to say that traveling has become a crucial part of human life, there are various ways to travel through such as railways and roads. Although both provides a numerous benefits, still it is recommended that amount of money should be consumer on betterment of railways than roads. I completely agree with the given statement and shall explore the dimensions of this topic with various facets.
There are ample of reasons to strengthen this view but first and foremost is safety. Railways provide a safe and secure journey, whereas journey along roads has been becoming highly unsafe due to more road accidents. Owing to heavy traffic on roads the chances of road mishappenings are elevating day by day particularly in urban or metropolitadn cities.
Secondly, journey through trains is very cheap and comfortable that anyone can easily afford it, on contrary its highly expensive to commute by public vehicles especially in buses. Moreover, railways can transfer large number of people without causing any pollution. Despite of all these facilites, it has been observed that mostly computers prefer to travel on roads because of poor sanitation and unhygiene at railways and trains. Thus, authorities should consume high on railways hygiene and proper maintainance by hiring sweepers on fixed salary. Addittioanlly, hawkers should be strictly prohibited to not throw the litter between the railway tracks.
In conclusion, I firmly say that, though improvement in both are necessary but government should spend on railways more, as it is a need of the hour today.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-25 | Kaurrippan0@gmail.com | 61 | view |
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads? To what extent do u agree or disagree with the statement. 61
- The chart below show the percentage of fatal accidents by locations in a European country The survey was conducted in 2000 79
- The two pie charts show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s 74
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing , including the process by which information is fed back to earlier to enable adjustment . 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'benefit'?
Suggestion: benefit
...oads. Although both provides a numerous benefits, still it is recommended that amount of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...ommended that amount of money should be consumer on betterment of railways than roads. I...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'railways'' or 'railway's'?
Suggestion: railways'; railway's
...hus, authorities should consume high on railways hygiene and proper maintainance by hiri...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, whereas, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26086956522 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7623057822 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.656126482213 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1947483862 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.916666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250233257425 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768216564796 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524525539698 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137167864987 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384033517536 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.