It is true that developing transport instruction include railways and roads is crucial for an economics. While I accept that railways system bring so much benefit, I believe that the decision to focus on building railways or roads of a country base on many factors and a government has to consider the benefit of each system for the whole economics in short and long-term.
On the one hand, there a variety of reasons why railway systems should be built widely and went throughout a country. One reason is that transporting goods by train in the safest way. Thanks to these features such as using rails to move and we can control train schedule so accidents rarely can happen. Furthermore, one of the biggest advantages is the volume of goods can be carried in one time. Obviously, that trains can carry tens or even hundreds times as much volume as a truck can. This feature help companies save transportation cost and from that increase profit.
On the other hand, depend on many factors, the advantages of roads system can outweigh railways. Firstly, besides saving cost, flexibility also is a competitive advantage of a company. However, in many cases, railways cannot be built in a specific region due to geographical problems while that problem can be solved by using a truck. Secondly, roads will be more effective than railways in short distance. For example, if you want to deliver goods in the inner city or next provinces, using a motorcycle or truck will be more convenience and save time.
In conclusion, it is certainly true that railways systems bring a huge benefit for a country, but this is no by means it always effective. So, an investment decision to whether railways or roads should be considered carefully.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'railways'' or 'railway's'?
Suggestion: railways'; railway's
...l for an economics. While I accept that railways system bring so much benefit, I believe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in short, such as, in many cases, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89491525424 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74740691512 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8342508623 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0925125221021 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03350741235 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318466784058 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653293340625 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253601624674 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.