Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Transportation is always one of the top concerns of people, in which choosing vehicles to travel is very important. It is said that money should be spent on railways more than roads by governments of each country. In my opinion, the authority should invest money on roads rather than railways.
On the one hand, buiding roads brings a lot of significant benefits. First of all, everybody can comfortably got to work, to school by their own vehicles such as cars, motorbikes.. without buying tickets like travelling by train. Besides, that citizens in developing nations aren't able to afford to buy tickets for train every day, simultaneously, the governments of these countries also don't have enough money to build railways. Therefore, investing on roads is a clever decision. Moreover, if too much money were used to improve railways, the transportation industry would deal with a financial difficulties or even be in jeopardy of bankruptcy. Nevertheless, the price of developing roads is also expensive. Not only does it make the environment polluted, leading to ugly scene of countries but it also causes traffic jam, which affects seriously to daily life of people living nearby.
On the other hand, railways are still so advantageous that lots of people use them. Firstly, travelling by train is very friendly with the environment because it mitigates smoke and gas emissions of vehicles. As a result, life will become healthier and cleaner. Furthermore, it is quite convenient for people to travel simply by buying tickets and going. However, the drawbacks of this way is also that inconvenience when travelling. For example, if anyone misses the train for some reasons, they will have to wait for a long time to catch another train. Also, too many people going by train will be the reason of chaos and uncontrollable fond and many different matters.
In general, the individual should know which is the most suitable way to move. For me, it is necessary for us to think about the convenience of vehicles on roads as well as friendliness with the nature of trains to have the best choice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rather than railways. On the one hand, buiding roads brings a lot of significan...
^^
Line 2, column 111, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'get'
Suggestion: get
...First of all, everybody can comfortably got to work, to school by their own vehicle...
^^^
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ir own vehicles such as cars, motorbikes.. without buying tickets like travelling ...
^^
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Without
...own vehicles such as cars, motorbikes.. without buying tickets like travelling by train...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...es, that citizens in developing nations arent able to afford to buy tickets for train...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 390, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the governments of these countries also dont have enough money to build railways. Th...
^^^^
Line 2, column 599, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'difficulty'?
Suggestion: difficulty
...on industry would deal with a financial difficulties or even be in jeopardy of bankruptcy. N...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 649, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...on of chaos and uncontrollable fond and many different matters. In general, the individual s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in general, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01146131805 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88856481684 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581661891117 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4856152127 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.45 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.45 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.95 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114386799755 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351961451491 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589040975829 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838669205484 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711141087089 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.