Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The transport system is the heart of any developed or developing country, on which the country’s budget should be strongly focused. In my opinion, railways and road transport are two indispensable entities on their own. They function in different ways and benefit us in their own terms, so to negate the importance of any one, would not be correct.
When we talk about railways, trains are very useful when carrying a large number of passengers as well as heavy loads from one point to the other, which may be thousands of miles away. Secondly, they are generally the cheaper and faster alternative over a long journey. Thirdly, the traffic control of railways is very excellent, which prevents any sort of jams. Lastly, they emit less amount of pollution for the number of travelers they carry. The city metro train in my country, which is electric-powered, is a major choice of commuting of the residents. It is due to the fact that it is comfortable, fast, and convenient.
Talking about road transport, it can be the best way to move around a city. Primarily, roads do not need a mammoth budget to build and so can be readily made. Secondly, a person can board a public bus at almost any time with ever decreasing waiting times due to the increase in fleet of buses. Thirdly, an individual can go for any urgent meetings at their convenience. The concept of carpooling has significantly decreased the traffic on the roads of several cities, despite the number of ever-increasing cars.
After seeing the advantages, I believe that it is equally important to spend money on both railway and road transport. So, the government should spend proportionately on both modes of transport from the country budget.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...n terms, so to negate the importance of any one, would not be correct. When we talk ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s, trains are very useful when carrying a large number of passengers as well as heavy loads from ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, sort of, talking about, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92096219931 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91741446163 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601374570447 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9545407614 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0760744000946 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0261002760521 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395309880176 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.058099949552 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588869644978 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.