These days young children spend a lot of time using computers tablets and smart phones . Some people think that introducing children to technology at a young age is beneficial .others believe that they would benefit more from playing traditional games.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The advancements in technology that humans have made over the last few decades are phenomenal. While some people think that giving early access of this to young children could be highly beneficial, others argue that kids could gain more by playing traditional games instead. I believe that there should be balanced mix of both of them for the overall skill development of a pupil.
There a numerous benefits of introducing cutting-edge gadgets to small children which cannot go unnoticed. First of all, early awareness of technological things among kids could inculcate an interest towards how new technology is developed, which may lead them to become great scientists, innovators and researchers later. Secondly, with some schools teaching entirely online through internet, it is only fair to say more will follow in the near future, so children should be fully aware of their laptops and portables. For instance, in India, several schools have successfully launched a completely online class and assignment delivering platform called <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Moodle</span>.
The traditional methods of playing outdoor games has not lost its significance over the centuries. Children who have a habit of enjoying conventional sports regularly benefit from several factors. The activity helps the kids to breathe fresh air and sunlight which help them to build strong and disease free bodies. The traditional games like football, swimming, or boxing among others also teach discipline and teamwork to the players. This can define and refine the person they can be later in life. The children can also take up these activities from just hobbies to a career defining skill.
So, to conclude, in my opinion, introduction to technology at a young age and playing traditional games alongside, can prove beneficial for the children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-08 | indianaspirant | 95 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | Sarbasove | 93 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | mayankdhami | 55 | view |
| 2018-04-20 | lovy | 39 | view |
| 2018-04-20 | lovy | 64 | view |
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your o 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 200 and 2010. 67
- The charts below show the average number of calories that is amount of energy in food and drink that a person consumes daily in five countries and the percentage of the adult population that was overweight or obese in 2013 in those countries Summarize the 63
- The bar chart below shows the US top ten processed food export markets 80
- The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'benefit'?
Suggestion: benefit
...lopment of a pupil. There a numerous benefits of introducing cutting-edge gadgets to ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4965034965 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26922142028 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660839160839 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6123864309 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.285714286 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249019280908 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761996560108 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730713181875 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161273205443 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597274376722 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.