Government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens' health rather than on protecting the environment. Do you agree or disagree?
It is a common belief that the government should invest a huge amount of money in medical development in order to ensure its citizen’s health condition. However, I firmly believe that apart from health-related researches, authorities should also put equal emphasis on protecting our habitat. This essay will discuss the reasons for my view as follows.
On the one hand, it is understandable why the government is encouraged to spend an enormous budget on medical researches rather than investing in the conservation of nature. Obviously, the variation in lifestyle has led to an increase in the number of infectious diseases that pose severe threats to society's well-being. Take as an example Covid-19 which not only is responsible for millions of deaths around the world but also causes economic downturns in many nations. Consequently, urgent actions must be taken by governors to allocate money to work out novel medical treatments together with vaccines. The sooner medicines are found, the fewer people will die.
On the other hand, despite the necessity of spending money on health-care studies, on no account should authority underestimate the integral role of ecology and therefore nature sustainability also deserves a large amount of funding. It cannot be denied that human's health significantly depends on surrounding elements such as air, water, soil, etc. that are being seriously polluted by a huge amount of pollutants and toxic waste from domestic and industrial sources. For this reason, financial support from the government to the preservation of the environment makes a great contribution to the positive changes in life. If analyses on negative impacts as well as solutions to improve the habitat quality are not immediately invested, wildlife and human longevity will be affected.
To conclude, each country's rulers should equally invest in health care researches as well as environmental studies at the same time in order to maintain society's sustainable development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-22 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | thanhtu000 | 80 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | phanhhh | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | Henry14 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-18 | immtee | 84 | view |
- Write about the following topic Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced They only care about how much it costs How true is this statement What influences people when they buy food Give reasons for your answer and include any rel 89
- The chart below gives information on the global sales of hybrid vehicles between 2006 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Doctors encourage older people to take regular exercise but there are few of them taking enough physical exercise What are the causes and what solutions should be taken to solve the problem 84
- IN the future it seems more difficult to live on the Earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live such as Mars TO what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that buildings such as flats and houses should be designed to last a long time Others believe that it is more important to provide accommodation quickly and cheaply Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...ay will discuss the reasons for my view as follow. On the one hand, it is understandab...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...nt of funding. It cannot be denied that humans health significantly depends on surroun...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aintain societys sustainable development
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, well, apart from, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44193548387 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03856756054 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641935483871 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5949000013 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2229387217 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612433947098 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696445868114 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122700174324 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501754096117 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.