The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens’ health rather than on protecting the environment. Do you agree or disagree?
In this contemporary era, there are various social problems that call for the government's practical solutions, especially on financial support. Regarding this issue, there is an increasing divergence of attitudes about whether the government should spend more money on healthcare research or environmental protection. In my perspective, both these aspects should receive the same level of concern.
First and foremost, it is reasonable to affirm that every nation should spare no expense and effort on medical research to protect citizens' have. Recently, there are various new kinds of diseases with intricate symptoms. They desire cutting-edge technology, medication, and therapy method. Hence, the government needs to focus on research this area to ensure their people's welfare. The covid-19 disease is the most obvious evidence. Many countries and international cooperation have allocated a large budget to research and invent the new vaccine to concur the pandemic. The situation will be desperate if there's no financial support for the research of this advent.
On the other hand, environmental protection should not be underrated. Many experts have revealed that numerous modern illnesses come from climate change. As the planet nature is becoming worse every day, there are various kinds of pollution that bring detrimental effects to humans' health. Global warming that has been melting permafrost also releases many strange viruses and bacteria that ham people's health significantly. Therefore, it is necessary for the government to channel resources, particularly money into saving our planet.
By and large, I pen down that the government should balance its budget and spend an equal amount of money on both medical research and environmental protection to secure its citizen's health. As these two areas have a close relationship, countries' administrations can seek out some practical solutions to help their people stay sane and happy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., medication, and therapy method. Hence, the government needs to focus on researc...
^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...mic. The situation will be desperate if theres no financial support for the research o...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...y strange viruses and bacteria that ham peoples health significantly. Therefore, it is ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, regarding, so, therefore, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63050847458 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92816220001 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637288135593 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6129194961 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7058823529 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260829119722 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698195035984 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865153887735 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154231264541 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374056601485 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.