The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.
The given line graphs cover data on railway system including the number of travellers and percentage of trains running between 2000 and 2009.
Firstly, as can be seen from the first graph, there was a fluctuation in the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009. The feature started at 26 million people traveling by train in 2000. Over the next two years, this number gradually rose by 5 million. Then, it suddenly plummeted to the start point, at 36 million passengers. From 2003 to 2005, the number of railway travellers considerably mounted and reached a peak of 46 million people. The next three years experienced a considerable increase of 6 million travellers. Finally, the line graph finished at 42 million passengers in 2009.
A more detailed look at the second graph reveals the percentage of trains running on time compared with the target of 95%. From 2000 to 2001, the proportion of railway vehicles operation was much lower than the target, ranging from 92% to 94%. The next year underwent the percentage of trains running on time hit the expected point. Between 2002 and 2006, this feature was erratic as it fluctuated between 92% and 96%. In the last two years, this proportion dramatically increased to 97% and remained unchanged till 2009.
Overall, the data on the railway system was unstable from 2000 to 2009. However, the general trend was upward over the period of 9 years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, look, second, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92016806723 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59359439181 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53781512605 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7974909125 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.0666666667 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8666666667 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46666666667 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428166621191 0.215688989381 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134395745599 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129756969207 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247569215416 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808887380397 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.