Some people say that the government should spend more money taking care of elderly people while others think that government spending should be spent more on the education of young people. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
From ancient times to this day, an increase in the aged population has been an inevitable rule that any society has to experience. With regard to this phenomenon, the government is often torn, whether they should spend expenditure on caring for the old generation or education for the young one. This essay will throw some light on both sides of the divergence and give a personal conclusion.
To commence with, there are some rationales for those who advocate taking care of elderly people. We must look into the fact that old residents dedicated their youth to the country's enhancement. In the past, these people were the main workforce that contributed to the advancement of the present. As a result, when they get older and cannot take care of themself, it is the administration that looks after them. This is also at a key point in the welfare system of any nation. In fact, many nursing homes and projects, specialising in elderly citizens should be spared no expense. For example, in Vietnam, the government yearly allocates a colossal amount of money to reward former soldiers, policemen, teachers, etc.
However, we should not lose sight of the education role for young people. While taking care of the elderly is respecting the root, focusing on the youngsters is forming a bright future. The young generation is an impulse of national development. Many experts and statesmen affirm that the young population with immature knowledge and professional skills will help the country conquer desperate situations, foster innovation, and mark the nation's name on the global map. The government should pursue an educational career especially in channeling resources into upgrading the teaching and learning system. In my perspective, an investment in education will always benefit our future.
By and large, I reckon that both old people and youngsters are legal citizens of a country. The authorities have an obligation to take care of their people, no matter how old they are. In the end, the government should balance the national fund and make a wise decision to form an ideal society for all generations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, so, while, as to, for example, i reckon, in fact, as a result, by and large, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09770114943 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80629894699 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58908045977 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2084790623 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3684210526 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3157894737 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15789473684 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244895753267 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666224033878 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464565262234 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142968334092 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00594514785436 0.056905535591 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.