The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens’ health rather than on protecting the environment. Do you agree or disagree?
It is commonly supposed by some that investing more budget in researching medical remedies is more necessary than tackling environment-related issues. While I think that new treatment methods are important to our lives to some extent, I disagree that environmental protection is a minor element.
To begin with, the limitation in curing fatal diseases such as cancer or stroke causes severe consequences in many nations, especially developing countries. As a result, many residents could not overcome and have to face death sentences. Secondly, the advancement in the medical field plays an integral part in not only human beings’ survival but also a certain nation’s civilization, economy, and wealth. Take the COVID-19 pandemic as an example, every business-related activity has been forced to halt in order to prevent this severe virus from devastating the whole world. More importantly, the loss of both assets and humans impacts hugely the workforce and enterprises.
However, I would argue that pollutants or natural disasters also need to be taken a keen interest in. firstly, the survival of people is reliant on the cleanliness of the surrounding environment and habitat. Due to witnessing many disastrous catastrophes, nations could be able to comprehend the enormous impact of the nature and ecosystem. For example, in a small village near my area, two-third of residents have suffered from lung cancer by virtue of the contamination in their water source. Besides, the phenomenal flood in the Middle part of Vietnam is also a graphic example of when hundreds of local people passed away, which affected significantly Vietnam’s budget and economy.
In conclusion, I hold the view that either the medical system or environmental issues need to be addressed and they played the same importance these days.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nmental protection is a minor element. To begin with, the limitation in curing ...
^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... played the same importance these days.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40559440559 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12424669389 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660839160839 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.105226399 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.923076923 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0769230769 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102599475406 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326968555559 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537997331982 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700518431302 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833882435541 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.