Increasing number of cars in contemporary society leads to several ecological consequences, therefore, some people would rather see more new railways than roads. Even though trains might have some merits, I believe that investment in road infrastructure should be prioritised.
Trains have long history in modern living, however, since their invention a lot have changed. Many advocates of rail transportation argue that trains are way ecological than cars. However, its not always true. Many local trains are still powered by fossil fuels, emitting tons of pollutions mostly in rural areas. Moreover, it could be also argued that trains can carry more commuters at one time. I concede that cars or buses are not able to, however, trains and its network would not be able to connect every city or the smallest town. Furthermore, building rail track is not only exorbitantly expensive, but also require advanced construction techniques and equipment.
Hence, I believe that building new roads against extending rail network should be done for these two reasons. Firstly, construction or development of new roads will reduce everywhere presented gongestions. As a result, vast of pollutions as a product of burning fossil fuels will be reduced. However, my strongest argument is probably positive effect to our society. People not only live in big cities, but they also live in small and isolated part of country. The smallest town can be have just ten or less inhabitants, but still needs to be connect with another town or urban areas. Most of logistic happen by road, moreover, people living in small cities can feel safe that in case of emergency, emergency services will be able to access them.
In short, despite its advantages, rail network will not be able to connect all towns and cities, therefore, on balance, I believe that spending money on new roads brings more benefits to modern society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... are way ecological than cars. However, its not always true. Many local trains are ...
^^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun inhabitants is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...e smallest town can be have just ten or less inhabitants, but still needs to be conn...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, moreover, so, still, therefore, in short, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18446601942 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73207402631 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592233009709 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0335673128 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2352941176 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1764705882 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0651707943988 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.019197017568 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301762648607 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0508955268503 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365994467772 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.