Governments Should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is undisputed that transportation is one of the most important infrastructure for everyone living in this globe. Nowadays, transportation modes are being digitalized and modernized. Presently, people opine that spending money on the construction of railways should be priority of the administration of a country instead of investing treasurers on roads.
Here, I would like to agree with the given statement firmly and some logical points will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
There are manifold points to shore up my point of view. First and the foremost, spending money in the development of railways would be lucrative because of it's speed rate and convenience. To demonstrate, Trains are the fastest transportation mode due to which people could reach their destination on time. In addition, people could sit on the trains comfortably and could read the newspapers, book because of its larger space in comparison to bus, taxi et. cetera. For instance, Digital trains are made in china for the ease of passengers. So that, the government should manifest their deliberate attention towards the construction of railways.
Furthermore emphasizing on my point of view, trains are more Eco-friendly rather than other modes of transportation. To be specific, Digital trains don not imbibe any non-renewable energy sources such as, diesel, petrol which are the main sources for pollution of environment. What is more, the rate of problems like coughing, allergies and other massive disease namely cancer could be controlled because smokes from the vehicles are the major cause of it.
To recapitulate, undeniably, Both mode of transportation is the need for the people. But, it is clear that the government should make their incredible plans for the development of railways for better life of people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
... the construction of railways should be priority of the administration of a country inst...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...owards the construction of railways. Furthermore emphasizing on my point of view, trains...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...modes of transportation. To be specific, Digital trains don not imbibe any non-r...
^^
Line 6, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...specific, Digital trains don not imbibe any non-renewable energy sources such as...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, for instance, in addition, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38245614035 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14967741781 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1431720922 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.266666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156564766293 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469290210712 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054620630451 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854041532697 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317659179294 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.