It is said that governmental representatives have to focus on allocating amounts of money for constructing railways rather than roads. In this essay, I would like to discuss the pros and cons of each case, in a more detailed manner.
Beginning with high-speed roads, given the fact that they offer ease of transportation, in addition to helping in enjoying the landscapes and reducing stress levels by guaranteeing a speedy voyage and on-time arrivals to work places and meetings. Railways also contribute to the reduction of traffic jams and accident rates. However, it can’t be taken for granted, the fact that such transportation method can be costly and not affordable for all citizens. Therefore, it can’t be deemed suitable for all, in terms of public transport.
On the other hand, with the ever-growing population, the demand on having more roads and highways is proportionally increasing. As more cars are bought and used on daily basis, in addition to introducing new public transportation methods, buses and taxis, for instance, with the remaining usage of the old existing ones, makes traffic jams recurrence’s likelihood higher. Furthermore, the need to expand current roads and build new ones is crucial, if population growth remains on the same accelerating pattern. However, the usage of a transportation method that works on fossil fuel is of high damage to the environment and the ecosystem, which must be taken into consideration.
In conclusion, having presented the main pros and cons of each case, in my opinion, money must be allocated depending on the infrastructure of each country, let alone initiating a research on number of cars, relying on precise information will contribute to investing the money in the most beneficial way possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for all, in terms of public transport. On the other hand, with the ever-growing...
^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...e of each country, let alone initiating a research on number of cars, relying on precise i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32508833922 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21402907486 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60777385159 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.0034528788 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4545454545 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0993975715672 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388980034138 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531158666655 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.069485721895 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057693939963 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.