Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is argued that authorities should use their budget for investing railways rather than expanding and improving the road system. In my opinion, I completely agree with those whose argue that government investment in construction of rail and subway networks would be more effective in the long run.
The efforts of governments to use their money on the expansion and improvement the road system are just the provisional solutions to alleviate traffic congestion. Firstly, the existing roads are obviously inadequate to deal with the increasing of number of mean of transportation especially private cars or motorbikes the here and now, particularly in city centers. Moreover, the large of emissions from people’s private cars or motorcycles commute to work every single day result in severe air pollution, and investment in new roads just make the problems get even worse.
On the other hand, others argue that the construction of rail and subway lines would be a much more effective long-term solution to the problem of traffic congestion and our environment. One reason is that more people will be encouraged to leave their cars or motorcycles at home, in order to travel more quickly to their destination by metro or rail services. This will reduce air pollution caused by the exhaust fumes of cars and motorbikes. Another reason is that if people use metro to commute for almost their destination, it could ease traffic jams, especially in the rush hour.
In conclusion, I believe that governments should prioritize spending on rail and metro lines rather than on building and widening roads in order to reduce traffic problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, so, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89915959883 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562264150943 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.7833760285 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.8 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124272607538 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539050305469 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594211718225 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969417604344 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690839419715 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.