Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Since environmental issues especially air pollution were significant to individuals, one of the main solution is to improve public transportation such as railways. Although authorities should consider them as the main foundation of transport, roads should be constructed perfectly, too. Therefore, I myself believe both of them should be devoted same amount of money.
To commence with, spending money on railways could end up gaining several benefits for the societies. If public transportation in one country was built as convenient as human’s own cars, individuals would not have a second thought to utilize them. This has included not only safe commute by them, but also a reasonable price. As a result, first impacts by using these kinds of transport has been allocating lots of money to its industry and also hiring many unemployed for various portion of it. One another considerable result could be reducing the amount of gasoline where have been spread by cars. Hence, there would be less air pollution so every citizen would own a healthier life with les respiratory diseases.
On the other hand, implementing many projects on railways and other kinds of transport, should not propelled governments to overlook the importance of existence of good roads. Major products such as massive amount of iron or concrete could not be transferred by trains or metro because of their weight and significance of safety. Because of that reason, Lorries or trucks are required to do this task, therefore, roads should be in good conditions in order to prepare them a safe journey.
In conclusion, in terms of regarding importance to issues such as spreading fossil fuel or gasoline into the air, public transportation should formulate actions in order to decline the adverse effects of other kinds of transport. I believe, however, it is vital to allocate much amount of funding in mentioned transport, other types such as roads should be in good circumstance, too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'propel'
Suggestion: propel
...nd other kinds of transport, should not propelled governments to overlook the importance ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, regarding, second, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22712933754 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93751327945 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589905362776 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1319253036 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.357142857 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142060007035 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530832377213 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497023003614 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877858620786 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025102561455 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.