Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It has been argued that governments should invest in railway systems more than in roads. Personally, I partly disagree with this statement as my belief is every traffic system is deserved to develop equally.
These days, residents of developed countries choose to commute by trains or buses every day. It's said that railway is much faster, safer and more convenient for commuters. Train's average speed is higher than car's speed, railway systems are also built underground, therefore people are no need to worry about traffic congestion or annual accidents. That's why many believe governments should spend money on developing and maintaining subway systems, which is a truth that no one can deny owing to the increasing number of people commuting by trains daily.
However, it doesn't mean that usual roads are unimportant. A large number of residents still use cars to travel between places since some prefer spending time on road in private space to squeezing in crowded subways. Moreover, roads are main active areas of some particular people, such as police working in traffic departments, taxi drivers and delivers. It also can be clearly seen that firefighters and medical teams need wider roads because particular transportation require space in order to access fires or endangered people. Furthermore, roads are parts of infrastructure, therefore governments cannot just leave roads out of their developing plans.
To sum up, both kinds of transporting systeen need investment and governments have to consider about how to improve traffic systems effectively and equally to ensure resident's safety wherever they are.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...traffic congestion or annual accidents. Thats why many believe governments should spe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...muting by trains daily. However, it doesnt mean that usual roads are unimportant. ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
... mean that usual roads are unimportant. A large number of residents still use cars to travel betw...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, moreover, so, still, therefore, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78528014159 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678431372549 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2034603251 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206070709633 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696884144239 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053186629146 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118495082796 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765650492454 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.