Some people believe that governments should use money on railways rather than roads. I completely agree with this statement because of several reasons.
Money is often needed to improve road condition because it can reduce the amount of road accidents. There is a lot of road accidents which occur because of damaged roads. Moreover, money is also needed to construct more roads in order to the massive growing of cars and motorcycles in some area. Thus, building more roads will reduce traffic jam because it gives another alternative for drivers to choose which road they will pass. However, these advantages are less if compared to the advantages that we can get from spending money on railways.
On the other side, money which is spent for constructing more railways will provide more subway train routes for people. As a result, they will choose to travel using subway trains than their private vehicles because they are currently available in their destined routes. Moreover, the money can also be used for improving existing railways so the subway trains can pass through them safely. The safer they are, the more likely for people to choose riding subway trains than their private transportation. If a lot of people choose to travel using subway trains, the level of traffic congestion that occurs in a country will be reduced gradually.
In conclusion, I completely agree that government should spend more money on railways than on roads because although using money on roads can improve the damaged roads which can decrease the number of road accidents and can build more roads which will help reducing traffic jam problem, those benefits are less if compared to the benefits from spending money on railways. Otherwise, spending money on railways will provide more subway train routes for people and will provide safer subway train railways which will make people to choose them over their private vehicles, and will reduce traffic congestion gradually.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to ride'.
Suggestion: to ride
...e, the more likely for people to choose riding subway trains than their private transp...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reduce' or 'reduce'.
Suggestion: to reduce; reduce
...nd can build more roads which will help reducing traffic jam problem, those benefits are...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, thus, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14641744548 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40792034249 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.433021806854 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.5753263933 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228511377592 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096635711473 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865317936514 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199315646859 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123805596733 0.056905535591 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.