Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is suggested that instead of focusing on roads, the authorities should invest more money in developing the railway network. Personally, I strongly agree with this suggestion.
One of the main reasons why the construction of railways should be supported is that railways are safer than roads. For instance, the number of casualties caused by road accidents has been reported to be larger than that caused by trains. While trains are controlled by computer programs, road vehicles are driven by people who can violate traffic rules and drive recklessly.
Another argument in favor of railway construction is that commuting by trains has been proven to be faster than by road vehicles. This is largely owing to the fact that while a train is on the move, other vehicles are kept out of its tracks so a train journey rarely gets delayed midway. In contrast, it is more likely to get caught in traffic jams and even lose up to an hour waiting while driving automobiles or motorbikes. Because of this, commuters in Vietnam, for example, prefer to get to work using trains rather than private means of transport like cars.
Lastly, it is worth noting that travelling using the railway network is more environmentally friendly. In modern times, most trains are operated using green technology. For instance, mag-lev trains could help to reduce emissions of exhaust fumes, unlike most types of cars and motorbikes that are used at the moment.
To sum up, I strongly support the view that investment in developing railways should be prioritized over that in improving roads.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate traffic rules and drive recklessly. Another argument in favor of railway con...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rgument in favor of railway construction is that commuting by trains has been pro...
^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... This is largely owing to the fact that while a train is on the move, other vehi...
^^
Line 9, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ioritized over that in improving roads.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
lastly, so, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06130268199 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68669538384 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597701149425 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6974885875 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.615384615 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177016710991 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674146682441 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070585019572 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110996794793 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603391413503 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.