The maps below show a book store in 2000 and now. Summarise the main information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The maps below show a book store in 2000 and now. Summarise the main information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant.

The two maps illustrate several changes done to the layout of a bookstore between 2000 and present time.

In general, the restructuring of the store is observed in the relocation of different types of books and the addition of a new seating area.

In 2000, the entrance was next to a bookshelf for travel, another for new books and a service desk. Opposite the travel section and at the back of the store were situated two sections for works of fiction. Books for art, hobbies and cookery were placed on three respective shelves in the middle of the store while non-fiction materials were found on the opposite side.

At the moment, the section for travel and new books as well as the service desk are still positioned at the same place. The most radical change, however, is related to fiction, of which space is reallocated to accommodate the books in art, hobbies, cookery on the shelf across the section for travel books. This freed up more space for the installment of 3 sets of tables and chairs in the middle of the store. Interestingly, non-fiction books have been moved to the then-fiction area at the back of store, whereas its past area is now used as a café.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, still, then, well, whereas, while, in general, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71634615385 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57692307692 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533653846154 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8281412581 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105786855225 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494506789303 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0189914715304 0.0843802449381 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705618781874 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00128612652088 0.0819641961636 2% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.