The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
There are given information about average carbon dioxide emissions per person in four European countries over a 40-year period between 1967 and 2007 by line graph.
Overall, what stands out from this graph,there are in United Kingdom and Sweden were downward trend, while in Italy and Portugal illustrated upward trend.
By 1967, in United Kingdom was the highest amount of carbon dioxide emissions at nearly 11 metric tonnes per person. Then, there was a decrease until the end of period and it remained at 9 metric tonnes in 2007. In addition, in Sweden started with just under 9 metric tonnes in 1967, following this increased considerably by 2 metric tonnes in 1967. After this, there was a dramatic drop by approximately 3 tonnes in 1987. Eventually, declined gradually until 2007 at just below 6 metric tonnes.
At this period, Italy and Portugal had nearly similar trend. They begun at just over 4 and 1 metric tonnes per person respectively. Simultaneously, there were gradual rise until the end of period which were at just under 8 and 6 metric tonnes respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 41, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...Overall, what stands out from this graph,there are in United Kingdom and Sweden were d...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'began'?
Suggestion: began
...Portugal had nearly similar trend. They begun at just over 4 and 1 metric tonnes per ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 1615.20841683 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 180.0 315.596192385 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98888888889 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68291347072 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 176.041082164 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561111111111 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 506.74238477 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7849130221 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226459051665 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988989784762 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963729452061 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161180291002 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893339538722 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 78.4519038076 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.