A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Most people are against exploitation of animals by human being and some rights should be considered as humans have. On the other hand, there are proponents who are for using animals in order to meet different needs such as food and research. From my own point of view we can benefit from animals in various ways like food and science development.
People thinking of allocating some rights to animals believe that they should not to be annoyed by man activities which could be deliberate and direct like hitting or haunting them, and might be occurred unintentionally and indirectly like demolishing habitats by pollution. These kinds of people even do not find science and food a reasonable purpose for killing or conducting chemical experiments on animals. They may think science improvement is not worthy of torturing animals by different surgeries on them.
By contrast, some came into conclusion that consumption of different types of animals’ meat is fair, and also it could be useful and logical to do various researchs on animals. Probably, discovering new ways of cure for diseases such as some brain disorders on animals like mice is the thing forming these kinds of people’s ideas like this. Furthermore, people can intake huge amount of protein and other advantageous nutrition easily by eating meat, so that is why some people think killing animals for this aim is OK.
All in all, from the shadow of doubt, I believe in haunting animals for food and also performing experiments on them, most people are against this perspective however.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ink killing animals for this aim is OK. All in all, from the shadow of doubt, I ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10894941634 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81118104641 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56420233463 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.0872692253 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.3 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349259726332 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148008512647 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823727327142 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222550109171 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901353351603 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.