Over the past decade, highly life expectancy has become a prevalent and publicly recognized phenomenon in developed countries. Although it may undoubtedly bad effect to individuals and society, there are some methods to solve this problem by directly strike to the impact of ageing populations.
On the one hand, having a longer longevity is an obviously natural desiring of people but it appears to have some problems affect not only mentally but also physically for both individuals and society. In fact, in order to having a longer lifespan people would have to choose working harder as well as spending more for taxes. Such obviously huge burden certainly make them not only feel tired, but also do not have enough money to spend for their basic life. As a result it maybe become a counterproductive impact to individuals. Besides, by having many elderly rate, the government is more likely to be more negatively effected by increase the retirement wage as well as need more facilities and accommodation such as libraries, nursing home, entertainment center. Such investment will be an obviously huge burden lead to a range of negatively new policies, such as increase tax fee, tolls. Even a small rise like VAT tax fee also can be a dangerous source of developing some problems for citizens.
On the other hand, there are certain methods could be considered to decline those problems via limit the disadvantages of elderly in the nation. Firstly, apparently having higher longevity means there are many more workable and energetic elder people. This would inevitable a source of worker for the country by increasing the retirement ages or invite those desirable elderly want to dedicate for community. Also, developing the workable resource seems to be a plausible alternative if the government have some attractive justified policies by introduce effective laws to attract talented and young people to their countries, such as the way that the US and Canada are working at the moment. In addition, the government also should introduce some positive regulations that support pregnant women and youngsters in order to having population rejuvenation in a long-term.
In conclusion, although having higher average life expectancy could come at a cost for both individuals and society, the return will be more plausible if the government can introduce some appropriate policies to repel the downsides of ageing population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 276, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to work'.
Suggestion: to work
...er lifespan people would have to choose working harder as well as spending more for tax...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 291, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ple would have to choose working harder as well as spending more for taxes. Such o...
^^
Line 2, column 460, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...gh money to spend for their basic life. As a result it maybe become a counterprodu...
^^
Line 2, column 481, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becomes'?
Suggestion: becomes
... their basic life. As a result it maybe become a counterproductive impact to individua...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 858, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...er to having population rejuvenation in a long-term. In conclusion, although having highe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2442159383 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92649558208 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53470437018 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.7220928242 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9333333333 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22768405031 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801205556969 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643714353944 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171254058661 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545627484386 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.