As housing is a basic necessity for people, governments should provide free housing for everyone who cannot afford it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Living accommodation is a basic need for any resident. Due to the rising living standard, urbanization, and other related factors, the cost of housing is rising high, making it hard for many people to afford it. It is argued that the governments should be responsible for giving free housing to them. I totally disagree with this idea and in this essay, I will support my opinion with some examples.
To begin with, I agree that there are some advantages that this development could bring to people’s lives. First of all, it is clear that by giving free houses, the homeless rate would be declined. This may also affect the percentage of robbers, drug dealers, and other kinds of crime. Furthermore, it may help reduce the spreading of diseases. When people do not have a home, they start to live in the streets, slums, cars, and any other places where they could lie down and sleep. Those places often contain different types of viruses, which could cause flu and other diseases. When living there in a long term, people’s health may be adversely impacted.
On the other hand, this evolution brings various drawbacks. One of the primary disadvantages is laziness. The living accommodation is one of the reasons why citizens work hard day and night to afford it. If it is given for free, they could become dependent. Therefore, in the near future, they may ask for many other things such as free food, free vehicles, free tax, and so on. Additionally, not every nation could make that idea happen. For instance, in undeveloped and developing countries, there is a lack of money to solve a lot of national problems like natural disasters, economic issues, and so on. By giving expenditure for housing, the countries may experience financial instability.
To conclude, this development brings advantages along with disadvantages. I strongly believe that the drawbacks outweigh any benefits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, such as, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00632911392 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75467730883 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582278481013 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9819575497 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.3333333333 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0476190476 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20712540652 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561839542555 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720429343472 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117214464599 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102447541307 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.