In recent years, workers or students not having change to go university prefer distance education facilities. Even if, it becomes popular among the society, it has a lot of negative sides. Thus, in my opinion distance education couldn’t substitute for traditional education in many ways.
Learning could be distracted by both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Teachers are very important for learning processes, they not only gives lectures but also they create an optimum learning atmosphere with warning students or adding their own experience. Learning without teachers is easily demolished. For example, when distance education student uses the phone or computer for messaging, anyone does not warn students so he continues to using it. Therefore, self control is essential for the distance education because students are teacher of theirselves in distance education, they had to warn themselves. Teacher experiences are very important too because experiences ease learning processes. Teacher’s methods are always the best method for students. Contrary, in distance education students should create their methods. Creating method takes a lot of time and when students don’t understand method eventually give up so they lost their ambitions and they lost attention to lessons. Since, education are provided from online or with mediums, technical difficulties might be experienced by students. For instance, connection loss, electricity outages completely affects distance education. For the reasons above, education are distracted by both student related factors and external factors.
A lot of universities provide online education and distance education but there are a few trustable universities. Dishonest ones deceive students with empty promises and imitated accreditation. The most popular deceptions are invalid certificate and doesn't provide promised lessons to students. For this reason, it had better apply university that gives traditional education because their curriculum is supervised by authorities, students could quickly get contact with their lecturers and administration about lectures and questions.
In sum up, because of distractive factors and unscrupulous universities traditional education teaches in a more effective way. Teacher experiences and disciplined atmosphere are crucial for education. In this manner, distance education and traditional education can not compare.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of negative sides. Thus, in my opinion distance education couldn't substit...
^^
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tance education couldn't substitute for traditional education in many ways. ...
^^
Line 2, column 732, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esses. Teacher's methods are always the best method for students. Contrary, ...
^^
Line 4, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ternal factors. A lot of universities provide online education and distance ed...
^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... deceptions are invalid certificate and doesnt provide promised lessons to students. F...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 8.3376753507 384% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03768115942 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06026289552 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56231884058 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1160120739 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6818181818 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6818181818 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239061984108 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854602659158 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933095864446 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189976765352 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380380976608 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.87 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.