The line graph shows the percentage of English and French teachers founding a job by year of graduation from 2001 to 2007.
Overall, the ratio of inexperienced French teacher a bit increased whereas the percentage of English teachers dramatically decreased.
Between 2001 and 2002 both of the ratios steadily feel by nearly 10 percent. At the begin, English teachers’ ratio was around 75 percent and French teachers’ ratio was 70 percent. In 2002, they decreased to 58% and 52% respectively. Also, it was the first time that the value of French teachers exceeded that of English teachers. However, French teacher rate hit 70% in 2003 but English teacher continued their falling trend.
From 2003 to 2005 both French and English teacher gradually rose. After 2005, the ratio of English teachers dipped to nearly a quarter of the beginning value. On the contrary, French teachers’ ratio linearly increased to 75 percent during the 2006-2007 period and ratio surmounted its beginning value.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... steadily feel by nearly 10 percent. At the begin, English teachers' ratio was aroun...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hers exceeded that of English teachers. However, French teacher rate hit 70% in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, so, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2875 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84604989415 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5061396895 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109309093747 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552626270532 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408514898111 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898121991467 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437462333304 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.