Today, it is important to note that TV has a growing appeal for a broad range of people’s ages, particularly children. An issue in dispute is how to ensure the positive impacts of TV programs on their daily lives. To me, achieving this goal needs productive plans that decrease problematic effects.
Firstly, although TV can provide kids with many beneficial programs, it is expected that it has unsuitable ones, too. The most cherished solution is parents who are under obligation to control what children watch on TV. The time and content of
programs can be considerably managed. Of course, they should enhance their awareness to be able to distinguish types and levels of schedules broadcasted on TV.
Furthermore, the government should recruit some informed experts on media to dominate programs of TV which can be divided into some categories. As a case in point, violent films have two sections including above and under18. Besides, the time of being aired also is under control. A drawback of this is that the control of these factors will be done indirectly. In other words, some children can stay up late and not attention to the age limit. However, if parents are more cautious this problem can be somewhat dealt with.
Finally, tv companies can limit unsuitable programs in accordance with some criteria like moral and human factors. In fact, there should be some protections that are performed by high‐skilled employees. However, these companies cannot take advantage of popular movies with plenty of fans.
From the preceding discussion, children will benefit from TV provided/if that all aspects related to it are controlled. With this trend, not only educational cases but fun programs are able to teach many effective items.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, in fact, of course, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16140350877 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8022195837 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628070175439 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.4659550387 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.7222222222 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.093362421362 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0285749106928 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418848640896 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0491721341427 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351199888777 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.