If spending money on protection of animal or dealing with problems of humans
It is widely acknowledged that humans have an inextricable relationship with wildlife animals. Therefore, how to spend money on the conservation of animals is an interesting topic. However, some people argue that time and money allocated to this endeavor is bordering on excess, this is more appropriated for humans problems. While this would be valid to the certain extent, I contend that putting more efforts into protecting animals is necessary.
It is understandable why people advocate the view that this will be better in case of spending more funding on humans. The key rationale in favor of this opinion is that there are more urgent issues on earth that need addressing than protecting animals. For example, unemployment and hunger rampant all over the world, many nations are in desperate need of funding to revitalize the economy and raise living standard. Compared to these very immediate needs, combating the extinction of animals seems like unworthy cause.
However, notwithstanding in the fact that there are many crucial problems to handle, I believe that it would be unwise to overlook the importance of animals. Firstly, Animals play an indispensable role in the food chain. For instance, if buffalo perishes, humans will loosen not only a type of food but also traction in agriculture. Thus, in case this situation occurs more time for different kinds of animals, sources of meat will be run out of. Moreover, in fact, humans and animals are inseparable. The extinction of animals, as divorced from human society as it may appear, could seriously affect the survival of mankind. If this was not prevented, the whole planet would deteriorate and soon people would lose the very resources that sustain their lives. This is a testament to how spending on the protection of animals is not at all trivial but needed to be warranted.
In conclusion, although there are many issues which are relevant to humans, I am convinced that the survival of animals is at the core of human existence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-24 | Dung nguyen | 91 | view |
- The responsibility for the protection of the environment is by the transnational organization or every country 92
- Should protect all animals or only some of them 42
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent byBritish parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014.The second chart shows the number of children who participated inthree sports in Britain over the same time period. 78
- If spending money on protection of animal or dealing with problems of humans 91
- Car uses of three countries from 2003 to 2009 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07878787879 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83099076713 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551515151515 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9527886878 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5882352941 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256594209124 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817761365918 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638048979162 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151844059366 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072693328382 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.