improvement in health education science and trade are essential for the development of poor Nations how did the government or richer Nations should take responsibility for helping the poor Nations do you agree or disagree
The importance of providing aid to the poor nations by rich countries is essential for the growth which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the positive impact in recent years. In my opinion, rich nations help poor nations because of mutual benefits and appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favouring the positive impact.
Analysing the statement and explaining further, the first and foremost reason behind this is that it is inter exchanging of natural and human resources which benefits both the nations. Another striking benefit its that this reduces unemployment, poverty and rate of crime. Categorically discussing, it cannot be ignored that main reason behind is that it is strong step and gateway towards globalisation.
Probing ahead, one of the main underlying reason stems from the fact is that rich countries become superpower and poor country become self sustainable. Moving further, it is pertinent to mention that rich nations have a lot of reasons and even their citizens have lived there good life without any difficulties. Moreover, health science education and trade are the pillars for the progress of the nation which is required both by rich and poor countries. Apart from the reasons aforementioned above, it can be clearly stated that why many are in the favour of this trend.
To recapitulate, according to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of global development are indeed too greet to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'interred'.
Suggestion: interred
...remost reason behind this is that it is inter exchanging of natural and human resourc...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...h the nations. Another striking benefit its that this reduces unemployment, poverty...
^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to greet'?
Suggestion: to greet
...nefits of global development are indeed too greet to ignore.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, while, apart from, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25925925926 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81894433927 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581481481481 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1660231612 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200285394465 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735357802124 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102551505492 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100421047152 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905849881443 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.