The importance of providing aid to the poor nations by rich countries is essential for their growth which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial Influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the rich nations help poorer nations because of mutual benefits proposition and this appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
Analyzing the statement and explaining further, the first and the foremost reason behind this is that, it is inter-exchanging of natural and human resources which benefits both the nations. Another striking benefit in this regard is that this reduces unemployment, poverty and rate of crime. Categorically discussing, It cannot be ignored that the main reason behind this is that it is a strong step and gateway towards globalization.
Probing ahead, one of the main underlying reason stems from the fact is that rich countries become super power and poor country gets self-sustainble. Moving further, It is pertinent to mention that rich nations have ample of resources and even their citizens enjoy good social and economic standards. Moreover, health, science, education and trade are the pillars for the progress of the nations which is required both by rich and poor nations. Apart from the reasons mentioned above, it can be clearly stated why many are in favor of this trend.
To recapitulate, according to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of global development are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, so, thus, while, apart from, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23859649123 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85742890887 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564912280702 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8634241569 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.416666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166442036729 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633590884465 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863625221049 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878094539335 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774610325253 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.